English Chinese (Simplified) French German Hindi Portuguese Russian Spanish

Sign up for our Newsletter

Get TheChessWorld Toolbar

Get our toolbar!

Social Connect

Grab the RSS feed!
Follow me on Twitter!
Add me on Facebook!

Support TheChessWorld

Why donate?

Chess Quote

That's what Chess is all about. One day you give your opponent a lesson, the next day he gives you one. ~ Bobby Fischer
How do you like new TheChessWorld.com:
 

FIDE Top 10

2700chess.com for more details and full list

Chess Talk

Chess Players Online:

We have 34 guests online
pogonina
Women vs. Men in Chess PDF Print E-mail
Written by Natalia Pogonina   
Monday, 10 May 2010 17:54

polgar susankarpov chess

There is nothing that disgusts a man like getting beaten at chess by a woman.
Charles Dudley Warner


Playing in mixed events is enjoyable since it allows one to learn more about chess and psychology, and to improve more rapidly. So why, one might ask, are women often segregated? The problem is that most organizers don’t support female players by introducing special prizes for women. Therefore, each time you play in a mixed event, you have to be ready to bear expenses and earn nothing, which is not what a chess pro is looking for. As a result, most strong female players prefer to participate in tournaments that can offer them a chance to gain a title and win a prize.

The obvious drawback of this is that it’s harder for them to progress – just imagine that you are regularly beating 2000-2400 FIDE players and learning hardly anything instead of clashing with the titans! That’s also one of the reasons why there are so few GMs among women. You just can’t obtain the norms no matter how well you perform, unless there is a certain percentage of GMs among your opponents. And where would you get those in a female tournament?

Nonetheless, if one can afford it, it’s always nice to face top male grandmasters. Today I would like to share with you one such encounter. My opponent for this game, GM Igor Glek, is a very strong player, winner of about 100 international tournaments. In 1996 he was rated 2670, good for 12th place in the world rankings. I understood perfectly well that he was a favorite against me, but what strategy should I pursue? Sometimes people try to play solidly and wait until the opponent starts incorrectly pressing for a win. Usually this strategy doesn’t work out that well. However, if you like to stay on the defensive, that could be an option. On the contrary, I am an active player who values experience and the opportunity to learn something new more than rating or tournament points. Anyway, in the long run the active approach brings more dividends.

Our game is an example of exciting attacking chess; I hope you will like it:




Last Updated on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 18:15
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Content View Hits : 1975569